Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Pursuant to rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, the appellant is granted anonymity. Failure to comply with this order could amount to a contempt of court . No-one shall publish or reveal any information, including the name or address of the appellant, likely to lead members of the public to identify the appellant.
             At the parties' request, this was a hybrid hearing. Both representatives attended by video link (Teams). There were no connectivity difficulties, and I am satisfied the hearing proceeded in a similar way had the representative attended in person.
             The Appellant attended the hearing by video link but was not asked to make submissions or answer questions.
             The Appellant appeals, with permission of First-tier Tribunal Judge Chowdhury, against the decision of First-tier Tribunal Judge Parkes (the Judge), issued on 8 November 2023.
             The grounds of appeal challenge the Judge's findings relating to the credibility of the Appellant's account. The grounds can be summarised as follows.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.