Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Pursuant to rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, the Appellant and/or any member of his family is granted anonymity.
No-one shall publish or reveal any information, including the name or address of the Appellant, likely to lead members of the public to identify the Appellant and/or his family. Failure to comply with this order could amount to a contempt of court .
      This is the substantive decision in respect of the Appellant's appeal against the Respondent's decision to deport him to Iran, dated 29 June 2022. This decision should be read in conjunction with the Upper Tribunal's earlier decision (dated 8 January 2024) that the First-tier Tribunal had materially erred when dismissing the Appellant's appeal.
      The Appellant entered the United Kingdom clandestinely on 23 November 2000 and claimed asylum which was refused by the Respondent on the basis of non-compliance with the asylum interview on 29 March 2001. The subsequent appeal was dismissed on 16 January 2002 on the basis that the Appellant had failed to attend his own hearing.
      On 28 November 2005, the Appellant was convicted of two counts of sexual assault at Sheffield Crown Court and was sentenced to 6 months imprisonment (and an extended three-year licence); he was placed on the sex offenders register for a period of 10 years which was later extended.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.