Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Pursuant to rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, the appellant ( and/or any member of his family) are granted anonymity.
No-one shall publish or reveal any information, including the name or address of the appellant, likely to lead members of the public to identify the appellant and or any member of his family. Failure to comply with this order could amount to a contempt of court .
            The appellant is a national of Nepal. His appeal against the decision of the respondent dated 13 November 2020 to refuse his claim for international protection was dismissed by First-Tier Tribunal Judge Thapar for reasons set out in her decision dated 14 December 2021.
             Permission to appeal was granted by First-Tier Tribunal Judge Pickering on 21 January 2022.
            Before me, Ms Javed submits the decision of Judge Thapar to refuse the application for an adjournment was unfair and the appellant should properly have been given an opportunity to provide the Tribunal with evidence that supports his account that he will be at risk upon return to Nepal. She submits that notwithstanding the late stage at which the application for an adjournment was made, the evidence is relevant and the appellant had provided some explanation as to why he had not provided that evidence earlier.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.