Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
             Following a hearing at Bradford on 8 September 2023 it was found a judge of the First-tier Tribunal had erred in law in allowing the appellant's appeal against the decision of an Entry Clearance Officer (ECO) who refused his application for an EEA Family Permit as the extended family member of an EEA national exercising treaty rights in the United Kingdom.
             It is not disputed that the appellant's sponsor ('the Sponsor') , is his brother-in-law, who is an Italian national exercising treaty rights in the United Kingdom, and who has been granted Pre-Settle Status under the EU Settlement Scheme (EUSS).
             The appellant filed a witness statement dated 2 May 2021 in which he confirms is a citizen of Bangladesh born on 1 January 2020 and provides his residential address in Bangladesh.
             The claim by the appellant that he is the brother-in-law the Sponsor is not disputed before me. The relationship arises because the appellant's biological sister is married to the Sponsor.
             The appellant's statement that the Sponsor lives in the UK together with his wife, the appellant's sister, and their three children, is not disputed before me.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.