Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Pursuant to rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, the above respondent is granted anonymity.
No-one shall publish or reveal any information, including the name or address of the above respondent, likely to lead members of the public to identify him. Failure to comply with this order could amount to a contempt of court .
          Permission to appeal was granted by another judge of the First-tier Tribunal in the following terms:
The Grounds assert that the Judge made a material misdirection in law and/or provided inadequate reasoning and/or made irrational and perverse findings.
The appeal was allowed on the sole basis that the Iraqi national Appellant would be unable to access a CSID document prior to, or within a reasonable period of, return to Iraq [64-82], and would therefore be unable to secure a replacement INID card which together with a lack of family contact would lead to a breach of Article 3 ECHR. The Judge's findings were that the Appellant was from Kirkuk. It is the Respondent's position that the Appellant is from the IKR.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.