Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
I have considered whether any parties require the protection of an anonymity direction. No anonymity direction was made previously in respect of this Appellant. Having considered all the circumstances and evidence I do not consider it necessary to make an anonymity direction.
The Secretary of State for the Home Department brings this appeal but in order to avoid confusion the parties are referred to as they were in the First-tier Tribunal. This is an appeal by the Secretary of State against a decision of First-tier Tribunal Judge Ievins, promulgated on 30 November 2015 which allowed the Appellant's appeal.
The appellant arrived in the UK as an 8-year-old child with his mother and siblings. The respondent granted the appellant leave to remain a number of times. On 14 November 2009 he was granted discretionary leave to remain until 3 June 2011.
On 3 June 2011 the appellant applied for further leave to remain. The respondent refused that application. The appellant successfully appealed that decision to the First-tier Tribunal. As a result of that First-tier decision, on 21 March 2014 the appellant was granted leave to remain until 21 September 2016.
On the same day (21 March 2014) the Secretary of State curtailed the grant of leave to remain in the UK made to the appellant, and gave directions for his removal to Jamaica.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.