Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
�Procedure � costs - application for costs out of time � whether discretion to entertain an application should be exercised � Rule 5 (3) (a) Tribunal Rules 2009 � whether direction should be made to apply Rule 29 of the VAT Tribunal Rules 1986 � Atlantic Electronics considered �� alternatively whether order for costs should be made under Rule 10 Tribunal Rules 2009 � whether Respondents acting unreasonably
Sitting in public at 45 Bedford Square, London WC1 on 27 September 2011, with written submissions on 22 and 28 February and 9 March 2012 and written submissions on
Richard Smith, instructed by the General Counsel and Solicitor to HM Revenue and Customs, for the Respondents
This is an application by the Appellant for costs in relation to a decision of this Tribunal dated 29 December 2010, which allowed the Appellant's appeal and directed the Respondents to review the Appellant's application for a licence under the Warehousekeepers and Owners of Warehoused Goods Regulations 1999 ("WOWGR").
The Appellant had lodged a Notice of Appeal with the VAT Tribunal on 25 September 2008.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.