Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
(Transcript of the Handed Down Judgment of Smith Bernal Wordwave Limited, 190 Fleet Street London EC4A 2AG Tel No: 020 7421 4040, Fax No: 020 7831 8838 Official Shorthand Writers to the Court)
Mr R. Drabble Q.C. and Mr D. Kolinsky (instructed by Sharpe Pritchard) for the Claimant Mr N. Giffin Q.C. (instructed by The Solicitor, Department for Work and Pensions) for the Defendant ____________________
I will not cite all the criteria. It is not said any is inappropriate but the first is:-
Nothing suggests that if there is no impact on the public purse then there should necessarily be no recovery under section 140 C (3) . Any such rigid rule would in any event conflict with that provision. The circular also said:-
Paragraphs 7 and 12 of the circular, so far as may be material, said as follows:-
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.