Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Corporation Tax � para 33 Sch 18 FA 98 � application for closure notice- discovery assessment made before enquiry opened � settled by agreement � effect of settlement on scope and possible conclusions of enquiry � Olin v Scorer considered- �reasonableness of continuing enquiry
Eastinghall Limited applies for a closure notice in respect of the enquiry into its 2011/12 tax return
At the same time Mr Laurie also concluded that it was likely that the company had understated its profits and its tax liability for 2011/12 in the same way. He did not have any direct evidence that this was the case but presumed that the company�s practice had been continuous.
This time was within the 12 months following the delivery of the company�s 2011/12 tax return. Mr Laurie could therefore have opened an enquiry into that return. But he did not choose that course of action: instead, and on the same date as he gave the 2010/11 closure notice, namely 18 October 2013, �he made a "discovery assessment" under paragraph 43 schedule 18 FA 1998. In that assessment he assessed the company to further corporation tax of �8,544.20 for 2011/12.
I consider that there is insufficient evidence to support the amount assessed in this year.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.