Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The creditors reclaimed .—Much discussion took place about the import of the interlocutor, which the Court held as not barring the claimants from showing aliunde, that the raiser had renounced his preference; but merely as containing an abstract finding on the law, and a finding that the correspondence, per se, was not sufficient to instruct a renunciation of the executor's preference.
Lord Ordinary, Jeffrey. Act. Sol.-Gen. (Rutherfurd,) and Crawfurd. Alt. Dean of Fac. (Hope,) and J. Anderson. Gordon & Stuart, W. S. and Gordon & Mackay, W. S. Agents. R. Clerk.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.