Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
This judgment is being handed down in private on 4 November 2002. It consists of 62 pages. The judge hereby gives leave for it to be reported.
The judgment may be reported on the strict understanding that in any report no person (other than counsel and Professor David) may be identified by name or location and that in particular the anonymity of the children and the adult members of their family must be strictly preserved.
THE ROLE OF THE PARENTS IN THE PROCEEDINGS AND THE INSTRUCTION OF PROFESSOR DAVID
THE EXISTENCE OF THE DISCRETION TO ORDER DISCLOSURE OF CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL: THE IMPOSSIBILITY OF TOTAL CONFIDENTIALITY
THE ARGUMENT BASED ON RE M (CARE PROCEEDINGS: DISCLOSURE: HUMAN RIGHTS) [2001] 2 FLR 1316 (REM)
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.