Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
For the Appellant: Mr L Rahman (counsel) instructed by The Immigration Law Practice.
I have considered whether any parties require the protection of an anonymity direction. No anonymity direction was made previously in respect of this Appellant. Having considered all the circumstances and evidence I do not consider it necessary to make an anonymity direction.
This is an appeal by the Appellant against the decision of First-tier Tribunal Judge Turquet promulgated on 27 March 2015, which dismissed the Appellant's appeal.
On 28 November 2013 the Secretary of State refused the Appellant's application for entry clearance to join her mother, Maureen Ndashye, in the UK in terms of paragraph 297 of the immigration rules.
The Appellant appealed to the First-tier Tribunal. First-tier Tribunal Judge Turquet ("the Judge") dismissed the appeal against the Respondent's decision.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.