Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
This judgment is being handed down in private on 8 July 2011. It consists of 28 pages and has been signed and dated by the judge. The judge hereby gives leave for it to be reported.
The judgment is being distributed on the strict understanding that in any report of this judgment no person other than the advocates or the solicitors for the Respondents to the application for a reporting restriction order (and other persons identified by name in the judgment itself) may be identified by name or location and that in particular the anonymity of the children and the adult members of their family must be strictly preserved. See: ORDER
THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE BAKER IN THE MATTER OF A (A MINOR) AND IN THE MATTER OF THE CHILDREN ACT AND IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION FOR A REPORTING RESTRICTION ORDER ____________________
Lucinda Davis for the local authority Frances Judd QC and Margaret Pine-Coffin for the First Respondent Douglas Taylor for the Second Respondent Penny Howe for the Third Respondent Stephen Cotton for the Fourth Respondent Adam Wolanski (instructed by the Legal Deprtments of NGN Ltd, MGN Ltd and Newsquest Ld.) on behalf of the Respondents to the application for a reporting restriction order (The names of the other solicitors are omitted in the interests of confidentiality.) Hearing date: 21st June 2011 ____________________
Again, the report made no reference to A, although one of the photographs included part of a dress being worn by her.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.