Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
For the Appellants: Mr Ashfaq Ahmed, a person registered by OISC at level 3 instructed by Western Law Chambers.
All appellants are all nationals of Pakistan. The first named appellant applied for leave to remain in the United Kingdom as a Tier 1 (General) Migrant, under the points-based system. His wife, the second named appellant, and his two children, the third and fourth named appellants, claimed as the first named appellant�s dependants.
The first named appellant arrived in the United Kingdom in August, 2005, as a student and leave in that capacity was extended until 31 st October, 2010. On 24 th October, 2011, he was granted leave to remain in the United Kingdom as a Tier 1 (General) Migrant until March, 2013.
The appellants appealed that decision and his appeal was heard by First-tier Tribunal Judge Ferguson in Birmingham who, in a determination promulgated on 22 nd November, 2013, found that in respect of the business, Ample Financial Solutions, the evidence required to show a calculation of income for the first named appellant during the relevant period had not been submitted.
�(iv) Official tax document produced by the relevant tax authority or employer, showing earnings on which tax has been paid or will be paid in a full tax year� and
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.