Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The suspender afterwards presented a second bill of suspension to another Lord Ordinary, which was also refused by the following interlocutor and note: ‘The Lord Ordinary officiating on the Bills having considered this bill, with the answers, and the former bill and answers, and the productions, refuses the bill, finds expenses due, and remits the account, when lodged, to the Auditor to be taxed.’
The rule about arbitration must evidently go with the principle applicable to the other point.’
Lord Ordinary, Moncreiff. Act. Sol.-Gen. (Skene,) and Hunter. Alt. Rutherfurd and Moir. A. Snody, and Gordon & Stewart, Agents. T. Clerk.
The Court , on the same day, decided a similar action, on a bill of advocation of a judgment of the Sheriff of Caithness, between the same society and their treasurer, as advocators, and Helen Macmillan, respondent.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.