Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
I have considered whether any parties require the protection of an anonymity direction. No anonymity direction was made previously in respect of this Appellant. Having considered all the circumstances and evidence I do not consider it necessary to make an anonymity direction.
This is an appeal by the Appellant against the decision of First-tier Tribunal Judge Walters promulgated on 3 April 2017, which dismissed the Appellant's appeal.
The Appellant was born on 15 May 1976 and is a national of Bangladesh. On 7 January 2016 the Secretary of State refused the Appellant's application for leave to remain in the UK.
The Appellant appealed to the First-tier Tribunal. First-tier Tribunal Judge Walters ("the Judge") dismissed the appeal against the Respondent's decision. Grounds of appeal were lodged and on 11 April 2018 Upper Tribunal Judge Canavan granted permission to appeal stating inter alia
5(a) Mr Symes moved the grounds of appeal for the appellant. He told me that the Judge had failed to take account of relevant considerations, and had failed to consider the evidence placed before him. Mr Symes took me to the appellant's bundle, where relevant letters of support are produced - many of them from family members, and then took me to [31] of the decision, where the Judge says that the appellant fails to identify his close family members in the UK.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.