Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The judge went on to consider Article 8 ECHR outside the Immigration Rules. She found that the case as "unusual" [22] the sponsor having undertaken maternity leave from her employer in September 2012 and returned to work in January 2014. It was not clear to the judge why the sponsor had not made a claim for maternity allowance during her absence from work and at [23], the judge wrote:
The decision of the First-tier Tribunal which was promulgated on 31 July 2015 is set aside. I have remade the decision. The appellant's appeal against the decision of the Entry Clearance Officer dated 19 November 2014 is dismissed under the Immigration Rules and on human rights grounds (Article 8 ECHR).
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.