Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Caoilfhionn Gallagher KC, Fiona Murphy KC and Harriet Johnson (instructed by Hodge Jones & Allen) for the Claimant Anne Studd KC and David Messling (instructed by Directorate of Legal Services, Metropolitan Police) for the Second Defendant Ailsa Williamson (instructed by Reynolds Dawson) for the Interested Party Charlotte Ventham (instructed by Transport for London, Legal) for the Mayor's Office for Policing and Crime (20 October 2023 only) Hearing dates: 16 � 17 May and 20 October 2023 ____________________
On 29 October 2020 two police officers visited the Claimant at her home and took further details of the complaint and completed a complaint form. On the same day the complaint was notified to the Commissioner's Directorate of Professional Standards. The notification form included the complaint form which itself set out the following information about the complaint.
A further letter on 10 November 2020 from the IOPC informed the Claimant of this decision.
In response to paragraph 4, Mr Mason accepted he had sent the emails and that they were inappropriate. In response to paragraph 5 he stated:
He accepted that the conduct at paragraph 7(b) had occurred, and that it amounted to "a breach of Authority, Respect and Courtesy and Integrity". He denied any breach of the standard of Honesty. Mr Mason admitted the allegation at paragraph 7(c).
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.