Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
(2)      Turning to the question of whether the financial undertakings offered by the father could be put into an interim financial order, Ms Bunwaree stated that if the divorce petition issued contains a prayer that includes custody, access and alimony, interim orders could be made which could be given on the same day for presentation. The court was informed there is an interim hearing fixed on 29 March 2022 at 9.30. Ms Bunwaree also confirmed the parties could write a joint letter to the court to ask for an earlier listing.
(3)      Ms Bunwaree set out details about enforcement of non-monetary undertakings either by way of a contempt application and also by making a formal complaint to the police, as breach of a protection order is a criminal offence.
(4)      As regards costs, Ms Bunwaree states the parties may apply for legal aid, subject to eligibility and confirms the disbursements costs associated with the lodging of exequatur proceedings.
(5)      Finally, in relation to any application made for relocation she estimated that such an application would take between one to two years to be determined at first instance level.
Notwithstanding the provisions of the preceding Article, the judicial or administrative authority of the requested State is not bound to order the return of the child if the person, institution or other body which opposes its return establishes that -
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.