Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
This is the appeal of Zubair Dawood, a citizen of Bangladesh born 30 March 1994, against the decision of the First-tier Tribunal (Judge Aujla) of 7 December 2018 to dismiss his appeal, itself brought against the Respondent's decision of 8 January 2018 to refuse his application for an extension of leave to remain as a Tier 4 Migrant.
The application in this case made as long ago as 13 June 2014, though Mr Melvin helpfully explained that this was because the appeal had previously been through the Tribunal system, with the consequence that the underlying original Home Office decision had been identified as not in accordance with the law, with the result that the most recent decision had been issued as a response to the 2014 application.
The background to the appeal is that the Appellant applied for an extension of leave, his application being supported by a CAS for a place at London Corporate College.
The application was refused in January 2018 because at the date of decision the Sponsor was no longer on the register of Sponsors. The Appellant was well aware of this difficulty by now, not least because on 2 May 2017 the Respondent had written to him, stating that his application was being put on hold with a view to giving him 60 days to find a new Sponsor.
(a) The Appellant had now received the benefit of "60-day" policy and so there was no procedural unfairness in the manner in which his case had been considered;
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.