Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
For the Respondents: Mr. C. Howells of Counsel instructed by N.C. Brothers & Co..
These are linked appeals against the decisions of First-tier Tribunal Judge Charlton-Brown promulgated on 14 April 2014, allowing the appeal of Mr Rishi Thapa and his brother Mr Hum Thapa against the Respondent�s decisions dated 19 April 2013 to refuse to grant entry clearance as the adult dependants of their father Mr Tika Ram Thapa, who served as a Gurkha in the British Army from 1975 until 1989.
Although in the proceedings before me the Entry Clearance Officer (�ECO�) is the appellant, and the Thapas are the respondents, for the sake of consistency with the proceedings before the First-tier Tribunal I shall hereafter refer to the Thapas as the Appellants and the ECO as the Respondent.
The Appellants appealed to the IAC. Their appeals were allowed for reasons set out in the First-tier Tribunal Judge�s determination with reference to Article 8.
The Respondent sought permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal which was granted on 19 May 2014 by First-tier Tribunal Judge McDade.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.