Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The unanimous decision of the tribunal is that the claimant�s claim of sexual harassment is dismissed.
The respondent was represented by Mr T Warnock, of counsel, instructed by Reavey and Co Solicitors.
1.������ The tribunal heard evidence from the claimant and from a witness on his behalf.� The tribunal heard from 11 witnesses on behalf of the respondent.� The tribunal also received four bundles of documents amounting to some 363 pages, an agreed chronology and written submissions from both parties.�
2.������ The claimant claimed that he had been sexually harassed by a third party while he was working in his employer�s premises.� The respondent denied the claimant�s claim in its entirety.
��������� (1)����� (a)����� Was the claimant sexually harassed contrary to the Sex Discrimination (Northern Ireland) Order 1976 (as amended)?
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.