Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
I have considered whether any parties require the protection of an anonymity direction. No anonymity direction was made previously in respect of this Appellant. Having considered all the circumstances and evidence I do not consider it necessary to make an anonymity direction.
This is an appeal by the Appellant against the decision of First-tier Tribunal Judge Thorne promulgated on 1 August 2017, which dismissed the Appellant's appeal.
The Appellant was born on 17 November 1981 and is a national of Vietnam. The appellant applied for leave to remain in the UK on article 8 ECHR grounds (both family and private life). On 14 March 2016 the Secretary of State refused the Appellant's application.
The Appellant appealed to the First-tier Tribunal. First-tier Tribunal Judge Thorne ("the Judge") dismissed the appeal against the Respondent's decision. Grounds of appeal were lodged and on 28 March 2018 Upper Tribunal Judge Gleeson gave permission to appeal stating
The appellant seeks permission to appeal against a decision of the First-tier Tribunal (Manchester hearing centre). The appellant is a citizen of Vietnam, who appealed to the First-tier Tribunal against the respondent's decision to refuse him leave to remain in the United Kingdom with his wife, a British citizen, on private and family life grounds under article 8 ECHR.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.