Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
In this decision the Appellant is referred to as the ECO and the Respondent is referred as the Claimant.
The Claimant, a national of Zimbabwe, date of birth 20 May 1993, appealed against the ECO�s decision, dated 14 March 2014, to refuse an application for family reunion with reference to paragraph 319V of the Immigration Rules HC 395 as amended.
The appeal came before First-tier Tribunal Judge Shanahan (the judge) who on 14 January 2015 allowed the appeal on Article 8 ECHR grounds, it being clear that the Claimant did not succeed under the Immigration Rules.
Permission to appeal that decision was given by First-tier Tribunal Judge Manuell, (Designated First-tier Tribunal Judge) on 24 February 2015.
A Rule 24 response was lodged by Mr O�Ryan, Counsel for the Claimant, who appeared before the judge, but he was unable to attend and provided for the purposes of the hearing before me a copy of his note of the hearing before the judge. Mr Royston provided a skeleton argument which was consistent with the grounds previously settled by Mr O�Ryan.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.