Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
For convenience I retain the designations as they were before the First-tier Tribunal, thus, Mr Vejandla is the appellant and the Entry Clearance Officer, the respondent.
The appellant is a citizen of India born in 1989. He appealed against a decision of the respondent made on 23 April 2015 to refuse him entry clearance as a Tier 2 (Minister of Religion) Partner. The application was refused under paragraphs 319C(f) and 320(11) of the Immigration Rules.
The reasons for refusal were that having entered the UK in 2009 as a student he submitted an in time application for leave to remain which was refused in November 2011 because he had submitted false documents in support of his application.
However, he did not leave after the application was refused. Despite stating twice that he wished to return home he failed to maintain contact with the Home Office only leaving in August 2013, nineteen months after the refusal.
In a covering letter (30 March 2015) to the current application he confirmed that he had used false documents.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.