Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
              This is the remaking of the appellant's appeal, against the respondent's refusal on 19 th July 2022 of his human rights claim, in the context of a deportation order having been made against him on 10 th December 2020. The appellant, a Pakistani national, is a 'foreign criminal,' as defined in Section 117D of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002. This Tribunal had previously set aside a decision of the First-tier Tribunal, but with preserved findings. The earlier decision is annexed to these reasons.
              In terms of bundles for the hearing, the appellant has adduced multiple different bundles for the hearing, including at least two 'supplementary bundles,' so it will not assist if I refer to a page number in a particular bundle. Suffice it so say, I have reviewed all the bundles which have been provided to me.
              The appellant, his wife and stepchildren gave oral evidence. The appellant adopted two written statements; and his wife and children one each. I also considered other letters of support from family members and a friend in the UK, as well as correspondence from the National Probation Service, amongst others (which I have still considered while not referring to them all).
              I turn to each party's respective submissions, before setting out the Tribunal's findings.
          As already noted, Mr Bazini made no further comment on the respondent's criticism of Ms Sarwar's reports.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.