Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Pursuant to rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, the appellant is granted anonymity. No-one shall publish or reveal any information, including the name or address of the appellant, likely to lead members of the public to identify the appellant. Failure to comply with this order could amount to a contempt of court .
       This decision has been made pursuant to rule 34 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008.
       The appellant applied for permission to appeal against a decision of Judge of the First-tier Tribunal Mill. The grounds submit, inter alia, that the decision was procedurally unfair because the judge refused to adjourn the hearing.
       Permission was granted by the First-tier Tribunal.
       In the respondent's Rule 24 response dated 24 August 2023, the respondent accepts that the judge materially erred by proceeding with the hearing when it was unfair to do so and that the decision should be set aside.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.