Civil

WILLIAM DAVIDSON v THE UNION CANAL COMPANY (Court of Session)

[1835] ScotCS 10_1834_SC_facdec_892Court of Session1835

Get the AI brief for this case

Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.

Quick orient — first passages from judgment

The Court , after allowing the Canal Company to give in answers to the petition, granted its prayer.

Act. Macdowall. Alt. J. S. More. J. & W. Dymock, W. S. A. G. & R. Ellis, W. S. Agents. D. Clerk.

Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.

Read the full judgment elsewhere

Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.

More Civil cases

Donna Breeze & Ors v TSB Bank PLC

[2026] EWCA Civ 32

Kamran Safi v Secretary of State for the Home Department

[2026] EWCA Civ 149

Lloyd Parker v West Midlands Trains Limited

[2026] EWCA Civ 357

John Textor v Iconic Sports Eagle Investment LLC

[2026] EWCA Civ 355

Hampshire County Council v GC & Anor

[2026] EWCA Civ 20

Peakstone Commerce Limited v Aziz Abdul Hozan Rahman

[2026] EWCA Civ 347

Common Room

Discussion

0 comments · About the Common Room →

No comments yet — start the discussion.

Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.

This case is reproduced verbatim from the public judgment published by The National Archives under the UK Government's Open Government Licence v3.0. If you appear in this case and believe it should not be published — for example because your conviction was quashed on appeal, you have statutory anonymity, or for other privacy reasons — request removal here.

Civil

WILLIAM DAVIDSON v THE UNION CANAL COMPANY (Court of Session)

[1835] ScotCS 10_1834_SC_facdec_892Court of Session1835

Cite this case in OSCOLA →

Get the AI brief for this case

Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.