Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The unanimous decision of the tribunal is that each of the originating applications was not presented within the specified time limit, set out in Articles 76 of the Sex Discrimination (Northern Ireland) Order 1976; but that it is just and equitable, in all the circumstances of the case, for an industrial tribunal to consider the complaint of discrimination on the grounds of sex of each applicant, despite the fact each said originating application is out of time.
The applicants were represented by Ms L Askin, Barrister at Law, instructed by the Equality Commission.
The first respondent was represented by Mr D Flanagan, Barrister at Law, instructed by Edwards & Co, Solicitors.
The third respondent was represented by Mr P Grant, Barrister at Law, instructed by the Crown Solicitor.
consider, in relation to each originating application, the following issues, namely:-
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.