Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The appellant is a citizen of Jamaica. She was born in 1996 and is now 18 years old. She applied for entry clearance as a child of a person settled in the United Kingdom (UK) on 10 August 2012 when she was 16 years old. In a decision dated 5 November 2012 the respondent refused to grant the appellant entry clearance.
I have made an anonymity order because this determination relates to sensitive matters during the appellant�s minority.
This is a matter that has previously been considered by First-tier Tribunal Judge Herlihy in a determination promulgated on 29 April 2014. The Judge made clear findings of fact and dismissed the appellant�s appeal under the Immigration Rules and Article 8 of the ECHR.
The appellant appealed against this decision in wide ranging grounds of appeal. When granting permission to appeal on 2 June 2014 First-tier Tribunal Judge Andrew identified one arguable error of law � Judge Herlihy did not consider the best interests of the appellant in accordance with the guidance in Mundeba (s. 55 and para. 297(1)(f)) [2013] UKUT 88 (IAC) .
The matter now comes before me to decide whether or not the determination contains an error of law.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.