Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Computer-Aided Transcript of the Stenograph Notes of WordWave International Limited A Merrill Communications Company 190 Fleet Street London EC4A 2AG Tel No: 020 7404 1400 Fax No: 020 7831 8838 (Official Shorthand Writers to the Court)
Mr JM Easton (instructed by Hague Lambert, Manchester M3 4PF) appeared on behalf of the Claimant Mr S Pickles (instructed by Bradford Metropolitan Borough Council) appeared on behalf of the Defendant Mr P Brown (instructed by Richard Buxton Solicitors, Cambridge CB1 1JP)appeared on behalf of the Interested Party ____________________
It is self-evident that, as Crane J held, a description of that generality did not comply with the requirements of condition 5(a).
It is right, however, that I should make clear that there had been no argument before him on that point.
So far (2) is concerned, the relevance of the decision in question has not been explained to me, but I can ignore it for present purposes. The reference at (1) to an application dated 10 November 2005 is in fact to the application of 8 November; but the discrepancy in dates is also not significant.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.