Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Decision: � The claimant�s application for judicial review is dismissed.� However, he may make a new application to the First-tier tribunal for the reinstatement of his appeal.
This is an application, brought by the claimant with my permission, for judicial review of a decision dated 14 December 2011, whereby the First-tier Tribunal refused to reinstate an appeal in respect of an award of criminal injuries compensation that had been struck out on 9 November 2011.�
On 29 November 2011, the claimant apparently submitted a written request for the reinstatement of his appeal, although a copy of that application is not in the file of documents supplied to the Upper Tribunal by the First-tier Tribunal.� The application was refused on the papers on 14 December 2011.� In the decision notice, the judge referred to the most important elements of the history and said �
�6. In the circumstances, I am satisfied that, taking into account that the �overriding objective� of Rule 2 is to enable the Tribunal to deal with appeals fairly and justly, I have decided that reinstatement is not appropriate in this case.
� I do not accept the grounds relied on by the Appellant.� The details of his civil claim(s) are highly relevant to this appeal and the Appellant seems determined to keep those details to himself.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.