Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
I have considered whether any parties require the protection of an anonymity direction. No anonymity direction was made previously in respect of this Appellant. Having considered all the circumstances and evidence I do not consider it necessary to make an anonymity direction.
This is an appeal by the Appellant against the decision of First-tier Tribunal Judge Boyes promulgated on 14 August 2015, which dismissed the Appellant's appeal.
On 14 April 2014 the Secretary of State refused the Appellant's application for a residence card as the unmarried partner of an EEA national. The appellant's partner, Ayele Leocadie Pauline Folly ("the EEA National") is a French National.
The Appellant appealed to the First-tier Tribunal. First-tier Tribunal Judge Boyes ("the Judge") dismissed the appeal against the Respondent's decision. Grounds of appeal were lodged and on 11 January 2016 Judge White gave permission to appeal stating inter alia
"3. Having had regard to the grounds for permission to appeal and the decision and reasons, I am satisfied that in reaching his decision the judge arguably made an error of law for the following reasons; -
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.