Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
             The appellant is a citizen of Bangladesh born on 10 th April 1989. He arrived in the UK as a Tier 4 student migrant in October 2009. He applied for pre-settled status under the EUSS on 9 th June 2021. This application was refused on 22 nd April 2022. His appeal against the decision was dismissed by First-tier Tribunal Judge Beach in a determination promulgated on the 16 th November 2022.
             The matter came before me to determine whether the First-tier Tribunal had erred in law, and if so to decide whether any such error was material and whether the decision should be set aside.
             The remainder of the grounds do now show any arguable errors of law in the decision as the decision in Celik v SSHD [2023] EWCA Civ 921 upheld the decision of the Upper Tribunal in Celik which found that where the appellant had no substantive right under the Immigration Rules he could not invoke the concept of proportionality in Article 18.1( r) of the Withdrawal Agreement.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.