Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Ms Caoilfhionn Gallagher (instructed by Lawrence & Co) for the Claimant Mr Hanif Mussa (instructed by Treasury Solicitors) for the 1st Defendant Ms Sarah Le Fevre (instructed by The Metropolitan Police) for the 2nd Defendant Ms Joanne Cecil (instructed by Coram Children's Legal Centre) Intervener Ms Felicity Williams and Ms Laura Janes (instructed by The Howard League) Intervener Hearing dates: 26th-27th February, 2013 ____________________
The report recommends that a 17 year old should not be treated as an adult (recommendation 9).
That entry in the record is shown at 5.49 p.m. and signed by the inspector. His own mobile was examined shortly after, revealing nothing untoward, and DNA, fingerprints and a photograph were taken.
There was then a conversation as to the location of the police station and a note that the claimant's mother asked how she could talk to him. She was told she could call back "in an hour or so or she could wait for him to call her". She hung the phone up.
The Statutory Scheme ... Annex 1 sets out some of the relevant statutory provisions and of Code C)
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.