Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
For the Respondent: Mr H Sayadyan, solicitor, of Gulbenkian Andonian, solicitors
We have considered whether any parties require the protection of an anonymity direction. No anonymity direction was made previously in respect of this Appellant. Having considered all the circumstances and evidence we do not consider it necessary to make an anonymity direction.
The Entry Clearance Officer brings this appeal but in order to avoid confusion the parties are referred to as they were in the First-tier Tribunal. This is an appeal against a decision of First-tier Tribunal Judge Martins, promulgated on 2 November 2015, which allowed the Appellant's appeal.
On 14 October 2014 the respondent refused the appellant's application for entry clearance as a visitor to the UK for four weeks.
The Appellant appealed to the First-tier Tribunal. First-tier Tribunal Judge Martins ("the Judge") allowed the appeal against the Respondent's decision on article 8 ECHR Grounds.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.