Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
I make an order under r.14(1) of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008 prohibiting the disclosure or publication of any matter likely to lead members of the public to identify the original appellant. No report of these proceedings shall directly or indirectly identify him. This direction applies to both the appellant and to the respondent and all other persons. Failure to comply with this direction could lead to contempt of court proceedings.
         The Secretary of State has been granted permission to appeal the decision of Judge of the First-tier Tribunal Cockburn who, in a decision promulgated on 15 May 2023 following a hearing on 20 March 2023, allowed the appeal of M T S, a 44-year old national of Eritrea (hereafter the "claimant"), on asylum grounds and human rights grounds (Articles 3 and 8 of the ECHR) against a decision of the respondent of 25 November 2021 to refuse his further submissions of 20 May 2020 on asylum grounds, humanitarian protection grounds and human rights grounds.
         At the hearing, Mr Avery informed me that he did not wish to pursue the Secretary of State's grounds. In my view, Mr Avery's decision was entirely realistic.
         Mr Avery accepted that it followed that there was no material error of law in the judge's decision and that the Secretary of State's appeal therefore stood to be dismissed.
         I am satisfied that there is no material error of law in the judge's decision.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.