Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
VAT � late payment � s 59(7) VATA 1994 � default surcharge -� Appellant claimed VAT payments made on time and that he had not� received notice of default or notice of default surcharges � whether reasonable excuse � no
Sitting in public at 4 th floor� City Exchange� 11 Albion Street� Leeds� LS1 5ES� on 21 October 2011
For the Appellant : the Appellant did not attend the hearing and was not represented
This is an appeal by Karl Badamchi Zedah (�the Appellant�) against default surcharges imposed by the Commissioners of Her Majesty�s Revenue & Customs (�HMRC�) under the default surcharge regime in relation to the late payment of VAT for the period from 07/2007 to 01/2011.
The Tribunal received in evidence, a bundle of documents including a schedule of defaults, the Appellant�s notice of appeal to the Tribunals Service, HMRC�s decision review letter to the Appellant, copies of all the Appellant�s VAT tax returns for each of the VAT default periods, copies of the default surcharge liability notices and a copy of the exchange of correspondence between the Appellant and HMRC regarding the default surcharges.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.