Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Subject_1 Process Subject_2 Cessio Subject_3 Reclaiming Note Subject_4 A.S. 24th Dec. 1838. Facts: Held that the A.S. of 24th Dec. 1838, requiring intimation of a reclaiming note in a cessio to be attested by an officer, was complied with by production of an acknowledgment of intimation.
The Court held the acknowledgment to be equivalent to execution, and ordered the note to the summar roll.
Counsel for Reclaimer— Mr Gebbie . Agents— Messrs Macgregor & Barclay , S,S.C.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.