Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The appellant was refused entry clearance for reasons set out in a decision date 6 th March 2014. His appeal against that decision was heard and allowed by a First-tier Tribunal judge in a determination promulgated on 10 th December 2014. The respondent was granted permission to appeal
On 10 th February 2015 the appellant, through his solicitors, informed the Tribunal that he wished to withdraw his appeal. In accordance with Rule 17 of The Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008 this is treated as an application for the consent of the Upper Tribunal to the withdrawal of his case. The Upper Tribunal consents to the withdrawal by the appellant of his case.
The consequences of this are that the decision of the First-tier Tribunal judge is set aside and I remake the decision by dismissing it; the decision of the Entry Clearance Officer therefore stands.
The making of the decision of the First-tier Tribunal is set aside and the appeal against the decision of the Entry Clearance Officer is remade and dismissed.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.