Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
(Computer-aided Transcript of the Stenograph Notes of Smith Bernal Reporting Limited 190 Fleet Street, London EC4A 2AG Telephone No: 0207-421 4040/0207-404 1400 Fax No: 0207-831 8838 Official Shorthand Writers to the Court)
MR R GORDON QC and MR D BOWEN (instructed by Scott-Moncrieff, Harbour & Sinclair, 19 Greenwood Place, London NW15 1LB) appeared on behalf of the Applicant. MISS M CARSS-FRISK QC and MR C SHELDON (instructed by Beachcroft Wansbroughs, St Swithum's House, 1a St Cross Road, Winchester SO23 9WP) appeared on behalf of the Respondents. ____________________
MISS CARSS-FRISK: My Lord, it remains for me then to invite you to make an order for our costs, but of course subject to the lottery proviso.
MR JUSTICE SULLIVAN: Right. So thus far the application is dismissed; the claimant to pay the defendant's costs, subject to the usual what used to be called a legal aid order. But the associate will know what to call it now and write in the proper words.
MR BOWEN: Well, in relation to costs, if I can just ask for detailed assessment of the claimant's Community Legal Service funding
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.