Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The Respondent, Navdeep Kaur (to whom I shall refer as the Applicant) is a citizen of India born on 3 May 1981. On 4 April 2011 she arrived with leave to enter as a Tier 4 (General) Student migrant expiring on 24 January 2014. On the same day as her leave expired she applied for further leave in the same capacity.
The application was supported by a Certificate of Acceptance for Studies (CAS) issued by the College of Excellence on 24 January 2014.
On 7 April 2014 the Appellant lodged notice of appeal under Section 82 of the Nationality, Immigration and Asylum Act 2002 as amended. The grounds refer to a letter issued to the Appellant by the College of Excellence which in turn refers to the SSHD�s Tier 4 Policy Guidance of 10/2013 which at page 66 states:-
If you have an application under consideration with the Home Office we will process any application for leave to remain supported by a CAS that your sponsor has assigned before becoming a Legacy Sponsor which has been made but not yet been decided at the point your sponsor has become a Legacy Sponsor.
The appeal was set for hearing in the First-tier Tribunal on 20 June 2014 at which both parties were represented, the Applicant by Ms Price. The operative part of the determination of Judge of the First-tier Tribunal Steer reads:-
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.