Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Mr. Nicholas Allen (instructed by Mills & Reeve LLP) for the Applicant Mr. Daniel Bentham (instructed by Hughes Fowler Carruthers) for the Respondent Hearing dates: 28th February 2014 ____________________
And then there is a discussion as to the basis upon which an agreement might be set aside and also as to the scope of any order which the wife might receive in this country.
i) The parties reached an agreement in New Zealand which has the same status and effect as a consent order.
ii) The status of the agreement was not properly disclosed to Baker J at the without notice hearing.
iv) It is not right for Part III to be used for a second bite of the cherry when the case was resolved consensually in a comparable jurisdiction such as New Zealand.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.