Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
The First Tier Tribunal made an order under Rule 13 of the Tribunal Procedure (First-tier Tribunal) (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) Rules 2014.
We make such order pursuant to Rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008. No-one shall publish or reveal any information, including the name or address of the Appellant, likely to lead members of the public to identify the Appellant. Failure to comply with this order could amount to a contempt of court .
       This is the remaking of the decision in the appellant's appeal against the respondent's refusal on 26 May 2021 of his asylum claim.
       The appellant then made further submissions to the respondent on 15 January 2020, which were treated as a fresh claim and refused on 26 May 2021. His appeal against this decision was dismissed by First-tier Tribunal Judge Chohan, and this decision was set aside by the Upper Tribunal with findings of fact preserved in relation to the appellant's sur place activities. It now comes before us as a resumed hearing to enable us to substitute a decision to either allow or dismiss the appeal.
       In relation to the appellant's sur place activities Judge Chohan found:
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.