Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
For the Respondent: Mr M Moriarty, Counsel instructed by Oliver and Hasani Solicitors
             I shall refer to the Appellant as the Respondent and to the Respondent as the Appellant, as they respectively appeared before the First-tier Tribunal.
             The core of the Appellant's case before Judge Conrath was that he is the sole carer of his disabled adult son, who is visually impaired, suffers from hearing loss and suffers from a personality disorder. The Appellant's wife passed away in 2015 from cancer.
             At paragraphs [45]-[48], the Judge also took into consideration that if deprived of his citizenship, the Appellant would lose his right to work, his right to rent and his right to a family life in the UK. The Judge noted that the Appellant would enter a period of 'limbo', when he would not be entitled to any benefits. We note at this juncture that this is the only reference in the Judge's conclusions to what is now commonly described as the limbo period.
         Lastly, in favour of the Appellant, the Judge had regard to the Appellant's claimed Roma origins and the claimed risks that he would face on return to Albania, which the Judge accepted at [34]. The Judge had regard to this factor at [48] whilst noting that this is not wholly relevant to the question of whether or not he should be deprived of his citizenship.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.