Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
             There were two linked appeals before the First-tier Tribunal. First, against the refusal of a human rights claim dated 21 May 2019 (HU/09894/2019 / UI-2021-001808). Second, the refusal of a protection and human rights claim dated 21 July 2020 (PA/04544/2020 / UI-2021-001808).
             Although the appellant did not pursue the protection claim before the First-tier Tribunal, the application for permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal included both First-tier Tribunal reference numbers.
             The Upper Tribunal found that the First-tier Tribunal decision involved the making of an error of law and remade the decision in relation to the appeal against the decision to refuse a human rights claim dated 21 May 2019 (UI-2021-001808 / HU/09894/2019). The decision was signed on 21 April 2023, but not sent until 17 May 2023. The Upper Tribunal's records indicate that there was no application for permission to appeal the decision.
             It has come to the notice of the Upper Tribunal that the appeal with the above reference number was not formally determined at the same time. This decision is issued for the purpose of finalising the appeal against the respondent's decision dated 21 July 2020.
             The First-tier Tribunal decision relating to the human rights claim is set aside and is remade and dismissed for the same reasons given in the Upper Tribunal's decision sent on 17 May 2023 (annexed).
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.