Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
[3] At this proof the five remaining issues between the parties were addressed. These were:
(i) Whether the pursuers were entitled to payment of the cost of an additional project post for the two months of September and October 2005;
(ii) Whether the pursuers’ entitlement to an additional payment for VQ (ie vocational qualification) management took effect from 1 September 2005 or from 1 September 2006;
(iii) Whether the pursuers are entitled to be paid a full year’s fee for work carried out between 1 September 2006 and 31 July 2007, when the contract was terminated, or a lesser sum such as 11/12 of a full year’s fee;
(iv) Whether the pursuers are entitled to be paid a full year’s fixed fee for apprentices’ accommodation for the year commencing on 1 September 2006; and
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.