Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
For the Appellant: Ms E Rutherford, Counsel, instructed by Rodman Pearce Solicitors Ltd.
Pursuant to rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, the Appellant is granted anonymity.
No-one shall publish or reveal any information, including the name or address of the Appellant, likely to lead members of the public to identify the Appellant. Failure to comply with this order could amount to a contempt of court .
             The Appellant appeals against the decision of First-tier Tribunal Judge Row ('the FtT/the Judge') promulgated on 3 rd February 2024. The Judge dismissed the Appellant's appeal against the Respondent's decision of 13 th November 2022, in which the Respondent refused the Appellant's protection and human rights claim.
             I have maintained the anonymity order in favour of the Appellant. I consider that the specific facts of this appeal, the maintenance of the integrity of the United Kingdom's immigration system and the Appellant having raised a claim to international protection, are such that an anonymity order is a justified derogation from the principle of open justice.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.