Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
Pursuant to rule 14 of the Tribunal Procedure (Upper Tribunal) Rules 2008, the appellant is granted anonymity.
No-one shall publish or reveal any information, including the name or address of the appellant, likely to lead members of the public to identify the appellant. Failure to comply with this order could amount to a contempt of court. I make this order because the appellant seeks international protection and so is entitled to privacy .
              Mr Scott wished to rely on "amended grounds". A copy of the amended grounds was made available to Ms Ahmed but for some reason it did not come to her attention before the hearing. It is dated 6 July 2022 and, confusingly is not marked "Amended Grounds" but "Grounds of Appeal to the Upper Tribunal".
              The First-tier Tribunal Judge who granted permission to appeal was critical of the grounds relied upon and the (amended) grounds should be seen more in the nature of a tidying up exercise than a complete redraft of the case. Ms Ahmed was quickly able to assimilate the points and was not embarrassed by anything arising so late in the day. Sensibly and helpfully she agreed to the appellant relying on those grounds.
              I found this case difficult.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.