Generate a structured brief — facts, issues, held, reasoning, and significance — for this case in seconds. Or browse the verbatim judgment via the source links below.
against a decision by W.M.H. Patterson, the Reporter appointed by the Scottish Ministers
Alt: Wolffe; R. Henderson (Scottish Ministers): Martin, Q.C.; Dundas & Wilson, C.S. (Second Respondents, Cala Homes)
"(1) The proposal represents a significant encroachment of the built-up area of Bearsden into land designated as Green Belt in the Bearsden and Milngavie Local Plan.
(2) The proposal is contrary to National Policy for Green Belts as stated in SDD Circular 24/1985 and NPPG3.
(3) The proposal is contrary to Strathclyde Structure Plan Policies GB1 and RES2 and cannot be justified against the criteria of policies GB1A and RES1A.
Auto-extracted from BAILII. Full structured brief in progress — the source links below give you the verbatim judgment in the meantime.
Multiple official and mirror sources — pick whichever loads cleanly on your network.
Common Room
0 comments · About the Common Room →
No comments yet — start the discussion.
Voted-best comments help future students and feed Caselaw's AI study tools.